It looks like there is circumstantial evidence the OP is crazybtrade based on the high number of received merits. Someone should research this further to see if there is more solid evidence of this.
Assume that the merit transaction leads to an A->B linkage (sender gains receiver's history). Not the other way around. After all, if users like peloso can send 50 merit to several accounts that don't have negative trust (myself included) then we can't exactly rely on this kind of circumstantial evidence to indicate a full connection.
wondering how much an account is worth and buying it is two different things, so I'll ask you to return the previous trust to me.