yeah. I encountered one. He always filled up the spreadsheet and always reminding us how to do our task and spread the name of the project. After the ICO end, he changes 
and he didnt answer us why he didn't responsible if we're not being paid. As long as he update the spreadsheet and send to the project itself.
and he didnt answer us why he didn't responsible if we're not being paid. As long as he update the spreadsheet and send to the project itself. Was at the same situation. Maybe they should split up those who is just counting and those who is responsible for the comfort of bounty hunters. So the second category should been paid twice more.
Yeah, I agreed with that. If bounty manager only does count the stakes and after that submit to the project, it will be disaster to the bounty hunters like us because we cant guaranteed the promised reward token for our effort. Bounty manager was the one who check if we are qualified for the said bounty. So that, he was the one who should be the middle man for company and hunters. Am I right ?
bounty hunters ( report ) -> bounty manager (report the work of bounty hunters) -> project
project ( token will be given to the bm for all computed stakes in the spreadsheet ) -> bounty manager (the one to distribute the said promised token shared) -> bounty hunters (received of promised token)
I think so. The bounty manager should be the middle man. He/she was the one who evaluate our work. Like in the construction, we are the laborer, bounty manager ( engineer ) and the project ( the one who hired engineer). We work for the bounty manager who hired us and the project will give the bounty manager ( budget ), so he should be the one who will distributed in the end of the work.