Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⚠️ “Relex [RLX]” = SPAMMERS ☠️
by
nullius
on 22/03/2018, 21:23:06 UTC
#1100145 “KevinVu-Relex” is spamming the forum for this stupid token.  I just reported 4 out of 8 posts “KevinVu-Relex” has ever made, for violation of this strict rule (boldface added) as quoted in the Bitcointalk.org rules:

Ads are typically not allowed in posts (outside of the signature area) because they are annoying and off-topic. It is especially disallowed to put ads or signatures at the bottom of all of your posts. Except for traditional valedictions, which are tolerated but discouraged, signatures are for the signature area only.

Are you mentally ill? The team might not be aware of such an arbitrary rule, hell I wasn't until you pointed it out.

Failure to read the rules is “the team’s” problem, not mine.  It is evidently a problem with consequences, since #1100145 “KevinVu-Relex” has been nuked:

https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php
Quote from: Deletion log
Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #1100145

As for your mental health question, I suggest that you ask your doctor about narcissism.  The world does not revolve around you.  You must learn to heed rules made for the proper functioning of a social community, or GTFO.





https://web.archive.org/web/20180322195227/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2075473.msg32918984#msg32918984
Spam? He was replying to questions, and linking their ANN at the end of his comments. I'd be hard pressed to call that spamming. Spamming would be him posting the same ad or link over and over, without provocation. I started reading your paragraph thinking I'd come away with a convincing argument, but I'm just disappointed I read it now.

I could see that but all of his responses were true and it wasn't like he was outright shilling the relex token so i dont see the problem to be honest. His responses excluding the link we're free of any shilling. So id just tell him to remove it, but i wouldnt say its spam...

Two living examples of Sharp’s Corollary:  “Spammers attempt to re-define ‘spamming’ as that which they do not do.”  Also, of Rules-Keeper Shaffer’s Refrain.

You do not get to define what spam is.





Maybe you are trying to FUD to get the price lowered (won't work), or maybe you are too poor to buy dirt cheap RLX, and you are jealous.

I wouldn’t take your spamcoin if it were given to me for free.

Anyway, thank you for helping confirm that Relex and Relex supporters are a nest of spammers and spam-apologists.  I will remember to never, ever buy anything made by anybody involved with Relex; and I recommend that others do likewise.

DO NOT BUY RELEX.  DO NOT SUPPORT SPAM!