philipma1957
260: -0 / +27
45: -0 / +5
+215: +22 (440%)
...
I've marked them with these colours:
Ideal, no artificial trust increase
Acceptable, normal
Barely acceptable
Mostly unacceptable but could have been a mistake which must be fixed immediately
Absolutely unacceptable, clear trust manipulation
FWIW, philipma1957 sells a lot of hardware on the forum - in fact, I recently bought a mobo from him - and I suspect he has lots of repeat customers which might skew his positive trust or make it look suspicious.
Nothing about philipma1957 is suspect...he has proven him self a 100x over trust wise. OP was just pointing out is that some of his additions to the DT network did not really help the network. I have traded with phil a bunch of times over the years as have many here and we all know he is legit. I think it is a good thing that people audit the DT1 members and should always continue to monitor who we add. I would love to see a private section added for the DT1 members to chat about who we are adding and why. There is not any rules set forth when we get added and we rarely if ever chat about who is added to DT2 and why etc...
Why not do this publicly? Transparency is good.
I want to mention a few things I looked at my list and could remove more from it.
I will. But I have 75 or 76 feedbacks I left out I know I can add more then 10 of them by multiple criteria mentioned here. I dont because it would help my numbers I would approach 1000 for my score.
Yet those people are good for the forum.
Also I report posts around 250 with about 97% accuracy.
I have no idea if anyone else does this or should I say it that I dont know stats on this for anyone else.
So I cant know how much anyone helps this way.
I can not read pms not that I want to but I have no idea of any good any one does via pms.
An example I had no idea this thread was here but someone pmd me. So that person helped the forum by getting me on the thread.