Such as the list on post reporting . I could decide to appoint everyone on that list if they are over 600 with 95% accurate. It shows no conflicts since I dont pick anyone I trade with. But I am not sure that is a good way to pick people
This illustrates one of the problems that I have with the trust system. I don't understand why reporting posts accurately should indicate that a person can be trusted in a financial transaction.
I hear you.
Frankly when I now look at the current list I have
-ck
CrazyGuy
Cablez
davecoin
lazlopanaflex
buysolar
not.you
DefaultTrust
Blazed
btcxcg
edonkey
HagssFIN
generalt
kilo17
and I add in this rule for trust I know where you live and have contacted you in person or telephone or emails.
my list shrinks to this
-ck
buysolar
HagssFIN
generalt
kilo17
DefaultTrust
So based on the op and possible liability for me I should further shrink my list to just that.
I certainly don't want someone saying my list caused them a monetary loss.
So for now I think I will shrink my list again.
As I think you would be safe dealing with those people and I know they help the forum.
when I look at my profile I read this
Trust: 343: -0 / +36