This here is the only part for me that was worth quoting. Bullshit.

I've notice a lot of these New accounts that have exceptional skills in tying things together concerning Moderators, and past history that escapes most of us "casuals"/ post 2016 BTC adopters.
So my guess is you either got caught up in some account farming or something else of the sorts that caused you to get a red mark on your actual account.

Maybe you are one of the people who just likes dragging these peoples names through the mud for some reason or another.

Either way I can only speak to Yahoo as I have had no dealings with the others you have mentioned. His trust is well deserved. should be able to leave an end of story there but I'll go on a little. I have 0 doubt when I wear a SIG for him that he will pay. The ICO's that he works for trust him with a significant amount of BTC each time as well; but you don't see that as they don't come here and leave him feedback.

I have seen a lot of things recently when I get bored, about accounts having been collateral in the past and how account sales have resulted in NEG trust, but I think it was situational and the "intent" behind that is what mattered; also DT trust is up to them there is no right or wrong just opinion.

Side note as well, account sales are only discouraged via forum rules... ( I in no way condone them) .

I'm sure everyone you have mentioned will be along to answer to their own allegations as well.