You can not blame trusted users for making deals with others trusted users. Or do you expect to make a deal with people you don't trust, or with 10 posts of great project Sir?
There are 167 users in DT, and Blazed has 20 users on his trust list. Blazed has just under 12% of DT on his trust list, while many people have 63%-100% of their trust ratings from this group of 12% of DT.
- the one about ThePharmacist
"PayPal deals, each worth $25" What the amount has to do? If it's $25.10 are you ok bruh?
I did 2 or maybe 3 deals with him, not any of $25. And it's one of the members you can deal with without wasting your time search for an escrow, sending your money first with no worry,
His trade history does not exactly make him the experienced businessman that I would expect to be in DT.
- the one about Mexxer
Back in 2014 Selling accounts was not something giving troubles as it is in 2018. It was "acceptable" maybe because people were not raping the system to death
You should tell that to those I mentioned in the OP. Many of them have gone back multiple years in Red Tagging users.
- the one about actinmyname
"actmyname doesn't run any signature campaigns, but does Red Tag many users who "abuse bounty campaigns" and who trade forum accounts. He has only completed a handful of trades, and his trust score is 18: -0 / +2, with all of his ratings being attributed to other users on Blazed's trust list."
Is it a must to run a signature campaign? Is it important the number of trades completed? Because I see a problem with. There isn't a lot of members who worth to make a deal with.
He Red Tags people involved in certain businesses, but has failed to give a Red Tag to
anyone in Blazed's trust
list circle. The exclusion from theymos should also speak for itself.