...We mined through the difficulty and brought it back down to normal before still deciding to roll back. I don't understand why you are trying to dispute this.
I'm not disputing that fact; I'm saying that that fact alone make makes this
notSafecoin, because at any time transactions can be mutable by a centralized handful of people in some random social media outlet, despite the fact that there's no valid reason to make
currency transactions mutable or that protocol consensus did not agree with the actions of said handful stealing the
currency from my miners.
You seem to want to glaze over the fact that
currency was, literally, taken from those that rightfully had ownership of it. There's a word for that "theft".
This "roll back" to "fend off an attack" was nothing more than outright theft.
Even if one were to agree that certain actors were "attacking" the network (which I still say is utter bullshit; because, protocol), that only excuses taking
currency for those that consensus believes acted in bad faith (examples of this would be ETH and DAO funds or TETHER and treasury funds). Stealing the
currency out of the wallets of
valid transactions that were supposed to be immutable and had nothing to do with the alleged "attack" is theft and, literally, makes this an
unSafecoin to even attempt to try to own.
Why even have "private keys" when a random centralized group that makes up only 5% of consensus can just take your
currency away from you? Of what validity is trying to claim "zCash Privacy" when an extreme minority can steal your private
currency out of your wallet because they are mad at someone else?
Your grasping at straws. This coin isn't even on an exchange. Had it been, things may have went differently. Thank God it wasn't.