-BTC-
And i guess you are spending a lot of quality time by replying all this karmicpanther's blab and whine, right JayJuanGee??
Never seen an intense yet funny talks about 1 idiot who wants to prove so much about rank is only needed and used for getting money in signature campaign which he cant get many merits vs merit supporter.
Hello karmicpanther, i guess if you put a lot of your hate energy into making a contribution to this forum, you will have merits and get the rank that you really need for you to grab all that money from signature campaign.
And i guess you are spending a lot of quality time by replying all this karmicpanther's blab and whine, right JayJuanGee??
Never seen an intense yet funny talks about 1 idiot who wants to prove so much about rank is only needed and used for getting money in signature campaign which he cant get many merits vs merit supporter.Hello karmicpanther, i guess if you put a lot of your hate energy into making a contribution to this forum, you will have merits and get the rank that you really need for you to grab all that money from signature campaign.
Not all people who are against the the Merit system are looking for money in signature campaign.
Its just simply unfair system which left lots and lots of people who do really try to produce quality post getting no merit while others who don't contribute anything getting merit for posting nothing more than spammy gossip message about merit.
I said try to produce quality post because not all of us is proficient in english and not all of us is good writer, given that most of those stuck is Newbie they certainly can't write anything about technicalities of BTC
Why would being critical about certain system which clearly failed to be fair should be considered not supporting it, its just false logic
Whatever the rules is people will judge it by how its be fair to everyone, when its leave some group of people will unfairly left behind people will bound to complaint no necessarily because it jeopardize their chance of making money