I'm sure they are good genuine ICO review sites, but the point I was trying to make was that, there are many cases whereby the "Reviewer" as such wouldn't care too much about the actual review and just cares about traffic hitting there website. As said above, I'm sure there are plenty of genuine ICO reviews with great content
In the end of the day it's always best to review ICO's yourself, don't count on ANYONE else to tell you what is worth investing in, the fact of the matter is what i think is a good idea, won't be a good idea to some others. I've learned that long ago, not just for people who say understand things like tech, to people who don't but you have to remember theirs billions of people with an insane amount of diffierent cultures so of course each one will have different opinion on whats a good idea or not. We're dealing with crypto now an international target audience, so what an american for instannce might see as a bad idea a korean might think is an amazing idea.
So in the end of the day invest based on your own views and impressions, if you want take others into account but don't let others drive your decisions fully.