Makes no fun knowing doog will win with his "infinite" balance and playing with very low risk.
This is the 3rd contest I have played in. I didn't win either of the first two despite trying to. So how can you "know" I'm going to win this one?
I was down over 34 ETH at one point, while the max profit per bet is around 1.5 ETH so I had to win around 20 max profit bets to recover. You think that's "low risk?
I think you don't know what you're talking about.
There should be something like a maximum wagering amount during the contest; i.e. you can only wager up to 100 ETH / day for the contest (ofcourse you can play further but only 100 ETH will be counted) - something like that?
The whole point of the contest is to incentivize wagering. Your artificial limits to try to cause equality of outcome are silly.
Chances shall be equal to all members - and that's probably what yolodice's devs also want to achieve.
Don't you think that if they wanted equal chances of winning for all players they would run something luck based not wager based? And then it would be overrun by bots like the low-level faucet was.
If you check his stats, you will see he has enormous wagering amounts on BTC & LTC also, but the winnings compared to this are relatively small.
My profit is positive on all 3 coins. That's due to luck and nothing else.
He just makes a small number of bets with a very little % gain in each bet. So no, he is not likely to lose since he will just fill up his balance and recover the loss if it happens.
It's not as easy as you make it sound. When the max profit per bet is 15 times your losses there's a good chance you never recover no matter how much you deposit.
Edit: "...babbling about.." Ever heard of politeness?
You started it by complaining that the person who wagers the most will win the "who can wager the most" contest.