All that said, people have an amazing way of "finding" facts that support their preconceived ideas. You can say that about Christians but I can say that about what is called "Science" today. There are many things that are simply theories that are talked about like they are facts that is not good science.
The difference is that science says, "Well, this is the best idea we got, based on this and this and this and this and this. And maybe it's wrong, but at least it's all based on this evidence." Religion says, "This is the idea we must have. Let's find evidence to support it, such as this and this, but not this." One starts with no answer, and tries to find it using whatever it can, the other starts with an answer (your so-called "truth"), and tries to find evidence to fit it.
Sorry, but, unlike what you and your group may believe, evolution is not actually a disputed theory. At all. Not any more than the heliocentric theory, or the theory that the earth is round. There is just way way way too much evidence for it, and every time we make a prediction based on this theory, it gets confirmed yet again. If you want to try to disprove that theory, at most you will make parts of it a bit more questionable. You won't automatically make your fantasy be correct, because the question isn't "Evolution vs Creationism," it's "Evolution vs Creationism vs Zeus vs Aliens vs Hologram vs Just a dream vs Martian migration vs... vs ... vs ... and so on and so forth." To get your creationism theory to even be considered, you'd have to actually find some evidence of something being intelligently designed (so far there's zero of that), or some evidence of a god leaving a message or something behind, one that could not have beeen created by humans, such as with a written book.
Creationist come up with many explanations but are just discredited because they are creationists. It is no longer about "good science" anymore.
I take it you did not watch the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQGive me an example of how one kind has evolved into another kind? Just one example? Sure there is plenty of evidence in the fossil record for adaptations within a kind for adaptations, but there is nothing that shows a monkey transitioning to human. I will never believe evolution to be more than a theory until someone can show me that there has been changes from one kind to another. Can you blame me for that? You can say "It took billions of years" but no one was there billions of years ago. So that, my friend, is a theory. It is not a fact. No matter how desperately you want it to be.
Also (as shown in the video) can you create a flower out of nothing? Why not? In the big scheme of things creating something simple like a rose should be easy enough but why can we as humans, who are fairly intelligent, not do that? It had to be created from something somehow. The entire world points to intelligent design. It is mathematically impossible for it not to be! Taking the physical variables into account, what is the likelihood of a universe giving us life coming into existence by coincidence? One in billions of billions? Or trillions of trillions of trillions? Or more? Using probability I don't even know how you can argue with me? See
http://www.faizani.com/news/news_2003/math_impossibility.html But all of that said, I really don't want to argue with you Rassah. We could fight all day about who is right or wrong. To me all of these debates just come down to a matter of the heart. There are people that do not want to believe in God no matter what. Perhaps they have deep rooted reasons for that. Perhaps they have been "educated" to believe so or as it has been reiterated here again and again they just think God is a myth. But there are those of us who have had personal encounters with Him that cannot be denied. Is it right for you to say that my own encounter with God is not real? You have not walked in my shoes so there is no way for you to say that.