As an economist, I worry about a lot of issues related to economies in this world.
Bitcoin is surely a revolution, but I worry that it is highly unfair for the older generations and the people who join Bitcoin in later periods.
Most people in the world do not hold Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency. If they started buying it, prices would soar and there would be a huge purchasing power transfer from those who got later in to those who got in earlier. For these people, staying in Fiat currency will be the best option.
Also, there is the issue of scalability and of the timeframe of existance of Bitcoin.
Isn't it better to jump try an ICO? And following this reasoning why invest in an ICO now when something better may come later?
I think many of the discussions about cryptocurrencies leave out those of our society who have less access to information and new technologies.
What do you think?
Thank you.
Yes, I agree that it is not fair for those freshers and beginner who have recently entered the crypto market and I am pretty much sure that they might not be knowing about the power of Bitcoin moves and other crypto coin movements where wonders are used to happen every month. As a trader i would like to add that it is not their fault in entering in this market too late, market dynamics used to change when there is huge participation goes on increasing and when there is a shift in nature of total demand and supply, which can be seen truly in the current market. ICO's are really a good alternative option for investment purposes.