Thanks for you input. I hope at the very least that if progress continuess and new real partnerships and developments are made, that you wont stay stubborn and keep on fudding till the very end. (such as the previous 2 smart contracts - which clearly are DEVELOPMENT)

The time will come where COE/MNY get delivered, then the project will move on and keep on delivering, maybe a few changes in the plan will still be made (and it will not be executed exactly as stated on factorybanking.com right now)
But is that not natural? i have my own ideas/plans in regards for crypto aswell, and i have spent most of the past 1-2 years to figure out how to do it in such a way that the plan just keeps on getting executed with no downtime/changes what so ever... but even i after 2 years (and let me mention here that decently big names are already involved) must admit that it is not as easy as it seems. You walk into laws that change the whole thing you didnt think of, you walk into resistance you didnt expect, and you walk into unexpected cost. (and allot more). Thats the nature of every project/plan.

Accusing Daniel of being a scammer for simply not executing the same way as promised, and changing the plan over time, to me seems like and early conclusion. Thats nothing but the natural course, how many projects can you name that are not having their downs and plan changes? Some more then others, and execution by daniel has 100% not been the best out there, infact, i agree that it has been poor in many cases, however Aslong as Daniel is around (and he is) and keeps on developing (and he is - Even if some developments are probably not official yet) = he is still going on with the project and trying to make it a success.
No one with the intention of scamming would do that, ever. Therefor I will wait, and therefor i hope if more developments come in that people dont stay stubborn the way they are now, and actually look at the developments. That i believe to be the purpose of this post, to officially monitor new developments.