Any performance/flushwork/etc benefits with BFGminer right now vs. the stock cgminer?
Seems to perform at least as well. More time is needed to figure out if it's notably better.
bfgminer version 3.3.0 - Started: [2013-10-22 04:02:28] - [ 0 days 02:14:20]
[M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit
Connected to stratum.mining.eligius.st diff 64 with stratum as user 14cbTxT4nN1AFQzEdFURb9co
Block: ...ed7f12e1 #265245 Diff:268M ( 1.92Ph/s) Started: [06:23:33]
ST:2 F:0 NB:29 AS:0 BW:[141/126 B/s] E:457.72 I:20.14mBTC/hr BS:939k
2/379 60.0C | 267.0/269.3/255.2Gh/s | A:6847 R:28+0(.40%) HW:14839/3.0%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KNC 0: 60.0C | 134.1/131.7/123.3Gh/s | A:3286 R:19+0(.55%) HW:12796/5.2%
KNC 1: 55.0C | 140.4/137.7/131.9Gh/s | A:3564 R: 9+0(.25%) HW: 2044/.82%
Also, I seem to be unable to connect using a socks5 proxy with the built-in cgminer, any comment on that, perhaps the compiled curl versions was a problem... How about BFGminer re: socks5/TOR connectivity?
I've not heard any reports of proxy problems with BFGMiner.