I think it is more along the lines of, "I think the way to solve problems is not by using force and violence of the inefficient state welfare, but voluntary charity programs that help people who are in need and do not have other options.
I tend to be a fan of allowing people to disagree, even when it comes to things like charity. The state doesn't alalow disagreement as if I do not pay for your method of welfare and choose a different one that I think is 10x better, I get locked in a cage or shot for my disagreement.
Well you can disagree with taxes, but you still have to pay them. Anyone thinking that the poor will be taken care of voluntarily through charity without welfare is naive. Same for basic science research, education, libraries, etc. Basically all the things that contribute to a great society.