I'd also like everyone else's opinion, because I do value them. I don't want to start having to delete feedbacks right after I left them.
I had expressed hesitation about tagging merit abusers early on, because there's so much subjectivity about the system, but at the same time there are some users who are obviously sending merit to people who don't deserve it. Obvious to my eyes, anyway. And that's the problem. I realize my feedback now carries more weight than someone who's not on DT, and I know I ought to hand out negatives to people who really deserve them. Do you guys think I, or any other DT member, should be tagging merit abusers? EthanB suggested in another thread that a neutral might be appropriate, and I don't think that's a horrible idea when there's doubt. But I don't think neutrals do much good.
Awaiting your opinions.
I appreciate what you're doing here to try to keep the forum clean, and dealing with such a large number of members it's obviously not an easy task, but it also is unfair to pass judgement like you sometimes do without asking, warning, reviewing the case or checking details and then especially ignoring all messages. Please take the extra effort to review details before handing out the reds to make sure there is a valid reason.