ok but as a matter of principal losing investor money as a result of fraudulent behavior could in theory be a form of murder. many of those people might have lived quite a bit longer had they been able to afford medical treatments that they now can no longer afford, or healthier organic food that they now can no longer afford ect... not defending bitthink I just wanted to point that out.
You trust your money to someone? You cannot use violence against him because he lost it. Even if he told you lies. The initiation of the use of violence is wrong, unless self defense.
That does not mean you cannot be angry. But don't forget to be angry with yourself also then. You should not have invested your money there. Take responsibility for your own actions, learn from it and move on.
That Zeng case is just looting and murdering of rich people by politicians. This immoral jailing and killing of people, and the abusive way children are raised, makes a cold, heartless society. I stay away for that reason eventhough the economic opportunities are big there.
Ok so i want to understand your position. Is it a matter of principle that it is never ok to use violence against someone for committing fraud? For example is it immoral to use threats of force to seek restitution for acts of fraud committed against you?