In my humble opinion I wouldn't trust Icobench ratings as they have a history of rating some of the best projects relatively low, while rating mediocre projects very high. Icodrops is much superior to them imo.
Seen absolutely the same happen with ICOdrops. They tend to rate what they like, which is not always colliding with what investment a certain project attracts. That seems to be more correlated with how good an investment network a certain ICO has. Which we have no idea about, sadly.
Also since most ICOs are not funded based on thow viable their business is, but how much hype they generate+whale investor network.
I am really really sticking to my guns on a viable product.
Stuff like Nafen, SKYFchain to mention a few really seems very very far from phasing into a viable product that has any practical usage. - Like most ICOs. Others like Moneytoken is just piggybacking on Celsius and SALT which from the start was pretty silly product ideas.