I have scolded the youngling for his naivety and errors in judgement
Looks like Atriz is a baby, also is that the standard procedure for dealing with them, cause I see members negging for far more inconspicuous issues; waiting for @ibminer to decided whether it's neg-worthy or not

No campaign manager should be seeing this as a marketing strategy and letting it go unhindered, especially from a group like ALU whom centers themselves around being "Trusted. Experienced."
This one is not on ALU, but solely on aTriz. People seem to make *unusual* assumptions as to how ALU works, although some of those aren't because of malevolent intent (unlike QS's).
Please explain what the point of ALU is, if a member's actions don't reflect upon the group? I don't want to make any assumptions.
I guess, to have plausible deniability if something goes caput and to claim universal success if any project performs.
