Please explain what the point of ALU is, if a member's actions don't reflect upon the group? I don't want to make any assumptions.
Senseless question. It is not my job to babysit others, the same way it is not your job to babysit NastyFans members; the same way that a member's actions don't reflect on the whole NastyFans group (/charity/whatever it is).
Don't compare ALU to NastyFans. NastyFans is a public organization anyone can be a part of that is largely funded by my personal donations. ALU is a private organization run by you and it's members are hand selected by you to represent your for profit services. ALU is funded by apparently lying to investors to scam them out of their funds. So, now that it is a documented fact that an ALU member worked with an ICO team to lie to potential investors in an attempt to fraudulently separate them from their funds, you feel it doesn't come back on you at all? You think it is ok that you still "trust" this member who fraudulently acted to destroy the name of ALU and arise questions about whether or not you are in charge of an organization that's purpose appears to be to help scam users out of their money with fraudulent claims? You think it is ok that a member who has been caught trying to scam investors with an ICO is a part of ALU?