If someone can get lucky and win $200 or more, cool, I'm happy for them. But I've never seen proof of a payout of $200 or better. And most people lose money here.
The fact that you are blind to see any proof doesnt mean the proof doesnt exist. On this same thread people posted such a proof and on this one as well:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1850855.0Allow me to correct your language, I didn't say that I was "blind to see proof", I said that "I've never seen
proof"... you even quoted me in reply. That wasn't even the point of my reply, the point was too highlight what is likely and unlikely. I prefer to deal with probabilities rather than possibilities, and win or not, the most likely outcome for a user is to lose money.
The only proof I had seen was people posting an address to show the transfer of BTC, which in my view was not proof. I had saved as a bookmark, an older thread from the last time I tested FBC (late 2016) that was supposed to be proof and there were only a few posts, also just addresses. Other than that, all I had was my personal experience which I also made a point to admit was biased.
That said, I wasn't aware of the thread you posted above (thank you), I'll spend some time to look at the posts. I also clearly stated that I might be outdated when I mentioned that I was unaware of any new posts, in this case an entire thread. At first glance, the thread you posted looks like a good retort, you didn't need to sour it though with the claim that I'm "blind to see proof".
I dont understand such an anger, unless you gambled and lost your money there.
I've never won nor lost money at FBC. And what anger? Are you just trying to fan up some flames? I'll offer you the kindness of assuming that you are intelligent enough to understand that one can be critical of claims without being angry. I daresay that your contributions would be better received if you didn't sprinkle them with personal remarks regarding those you are addressing.