35k9rLVHPyVDbb3FP4K1hedg62cCYGteH9
The above bitcoin address has been used by two users:
hhampuz here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3082093.0
and by Quickseller in their profile, here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=358020
by the meta section transitive property, this means hhampuz is yet another alt of Quickseller...
Confirmed, quickseller uses the wallet address 35k9rLVHPyVDbb3FP4K1hedg62cCYGteH9
as archived here:
http://archive.li/HK4lA#selection-1537.0-1539.0Link to post:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1436577.msg14533165#msg14533165 quickseller used the wallet address
35k9rLVHPyVDbb3FP4K1hedg62cCYGteH9 in his/her signature as their tipping address on the 14th of April, 2016.
hhampuz uses the wallet address
35k9rLVHPyVDbb3FP4K1hedg62cCYGteH9 in the above listed thread as archived here:
http://archive.is/FFV59#selection-583.8-587.34Unless
hhampuz comes forward to say they were using quickseller's wallet address on his/her behalf
as they did with TMAN then it would seem
hhampuz is an alt of quickseller.
Thankfully I am not an alt of Quickseller (we don't need more of them). I was simply trying to prove a point after Quickseller made this, IMO, stupid justification on why he put me and TMAN up as alts of each other:
You think two accounts using the same address isnt proof they are the same person? Is this because they are closely associated with you? Or do you apply this standard to everyone?
I held a public raffle in which I had the particiapants send their ticket costs directly to QS. The item in the raffle was successfully shipped out and received by the winner btw.
EDIT; Whether or not these raffle ticket purchases could have been seen as a bribe (QS removed a negative trust he'd left me after the raffle), is a whole different matter and not something that is suitable for this thread.