Users can almost automatically trust the technical accuracy of any post awarded merit by . . . DannyHamilton . . .
This is not entirely true.
Per my
merit sending policy page, I am generally willing to award a small amount of merit to any user that I believe is making an honest effort to learn:
- snip -- I don't care how good (or bad) your english or grammar is. If you are sincerely trying to learn, or helping with CORRECT information where you can, then you deserve merit.
- - snip -
- Being ACTUALLY helpful in the Bitcoin Technical Support or Development & Technical Discussion sub-forums (without a signature ad) will VERY LIKELY earn you merit from me.
- Asking well thought out questions in the Bitcoin Technical Support or Development & Technical Discussion sub-forums (without a signature ad) with a sincere interest in learning about something specific that confuses you will VERY LIKELY earn you merit from me.
- snip - A post doesn't need to have high technical accuracy to earn merit from me. It simply needs to be helpful, and reasonably correct, or needs to be a reasonable attempt to learn. I will reply to the thread with additional details if I feel that the merited post isn't 100% accurate or leaves open questions.