A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.
You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.
Sorry but anyone who uses the term 'yall' is instantly going on my iggy list. We have to keep to certain standards. Bye fintoff.
1. i fully expect this post to be deleted, but your mindless/wasteful/non-beneficial posts to not be deleted.
2. how exactly does name calling help further the cause of ACtM? you all/youz guyz/you's/yall (pretty sure yall wouldnt rag on the infallible Ken for using the location appropriate for the plural you) seem to think it helps, so lets see if this game is fun or not (spoiler its really not) StuartYuk, MinerFart/MinerShart/etc etc etc, CumZero (cause you are impotent), and insert-clever-name-variation of anyone else who thinks that this either helps prove your point or makes you appear smarter than the person you are addressing.
3. iggy... really?
4. we have no product, we have no real updates as to the status of the potential product, we have no idea of staff or resources available to assemble/test/ship/sell/support this future product. cheering on the demise/problems/short-comings of other companies that actually have product and far-more-than-you-could-possibly-imagine (starwars reference) sales compared to ACtM doesnt help us get any more clarity on where this company is. does "popping the champers!" include learning from others mistakes (as you mentioned in the quote below)? early celebration for no current status of ACtM's product doesnt imply that ACtM 'has it's shit together'?
5. Ken continues to ignore/not care about the fact that his investors are asking for this info and more. maybe cause he is scared to report nothing, maybe because of NDA, maybe because he just likes to surprise people, maybe because he doesnt give a damn, maybe he loves to see all this drama on his thread. a whole lot of maybes, and since he is obviously reading this thread (i have several deleted posts to prove that) he knows he's just leaving us flapping in the wind.
Stop your lies. No-one said ActM 'has it's shit together' and no-one is implying that. The point being made here is that we should do everything we can to ensure we 'do get our shit together', and that includes learning from other companies mistakes.