Just to show the absurdity of this argument I've created the following mad-libs below. They are not a perfect comparasion, but I believe they get the point across.
If you don't like a multi-national corporation raping your country then start your own multi-national corporation. Everyone who thinks it's a good idea will join it. Other's won't unless you force them to. We'll then let people figure out how great your multi-national corporation is.
Those examples are all way too broad to even debate with. What does raping refer to exactly? Strip mining and polluting someone's water? If a national corporation does this, then this is actually a role for government to protect property rights in my opinion.
If you want to live in a country that it's a global empire then start your own country. Everyone who thinks it's a good idea will join it. Other's won't unless you force them to. We'll then let people figure out how valuable living in a country that isn't a war all the time is.
There is a very obvious logical fallacy here, and that is that in order to have a global empire in the first place, you must apply force. This same thing applies to those other examples you posted.