aTriz is the one who usually posts the ANN threads, which doesn't necessarily imply that he manages the whole campaign or any aspect of it.
This makes things a little clearer(not entirely) for the purpose of ALU.
What makes sense in your view is not of importance to me. It works (this being an exception) the way that it currently is set up, and that won't change. Nobody is on the line because of this as they aren't remotely responsible for his actions.
Seems like aTriz was all on his own representing bitblisscoin as I don't see the ALU banner there,I might be wrong though.
There is no business and yes it is babysitting.
You're a part of a team,where one has to help the other during the times of crisis. Call it as you may but its actually helping out your partner when he is known to be naive in the past.
Again, did I hire you as a business consultant? No.
I didn't mean any offense,I am just merely curious on how things went the other way around. If you find me being nitpicky or something ,fine. But that doesn't change the truth.
When we start putting disclaimers in threads (and I do hope that others follow), the same is going to happen. Are you going to blame the managers when users do not read it?

Of course not,people are stupid. Its not the manager that is to be blamed here. But that's not my point. aTriz lied about the details of the ICO,people trusted him(good lord,people trust that green shit too much) and turned to be even more naive than aTriz.
Read the full statement before commenting next time.
My bad,but I haven't heard from aTriz after he said that he was "forced" to mispresent the information in the name of a
marketing strategy.
Again,I am not trying to be offensive or trying to attack someone here,but this was like I said an unexpected course of event from aTriz. I still want to believe this whole dilemma to be false but it isn't. So don't mistaken my curiousness with something else.