The benefit seems most tangible for the consumer. If a product has been shipped and was outside the temperature threshold but doesn't visibly look spoiled, is it destroyed?
Yes, it should be. Often these issues are not discovered which can lead to food poisoning or worse. By continuously monitoring the product and environment, and alerting participants to issues before they happen we hope to reduce the food that needs to be destroyed. But, if a food product becomes unsafe, we will capture that and alert the owner that it needs to be destroyed.
Absolutely. As a consumer I would gravitate toward a business where I know the food is safer.