As an economist, I worry about a lot of issues related to economies in this world.
Bitcoin is surely a revolution, but I worry that it is highly unfair for the older generations and the people who join Bitcoin in later periods.
Most people in the world do not hold Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency. If they started buying it, prices would soar and there would be a huge purchasing power transfer from those who got later in to those who got in earlier. For these people, staying in Fiat currency will be the best option.
Also, there is the issue of scalability and of the timeframe of existance of Bitcoin.
Isn't it better to jump try an ICO? And following this reasoning why invest in an ICO now when something better may come later?
I think many of the discussions about cryptocurrencies leave out those of our society who have less access to information and new technologies.
What do you think?
Thank you.
In my opinion, that is not unfair for old people those who do not have even information about them. Because, after the Soviet Union demolished in the past, there were so many people who used advantages of it, and obviously many of us did not live in those time of period, so what should we do? Do we need to use time travel for going past?

Technology is consumed efficiently only with people who are capable of new developments. Whoever does not have enough information in time, thats their problem, you should not worry about them, if you can just inform and advice them.