Just because a person makes a bad decision, does not make them intrinsically bad, or even a scammer for that matter. [1]
-sni-
Wouldn't it have been more logical to tell aTriz how to make this right, rather than going this route?[9]
[1] This applies to hundreds of others who have been negged for one single issue and will never be given a second chance.
P.S. Did @snakey get his investment back?
P.P.S. Are there other claimants as well?
It's understandable what you mean here but looking at past I don't think there were enough members:-
1. Who were frankly telling about the company and revealing the marketing strategy to the community even when it could put them in danger.
2. Who were paying back their loans when they were negged.
3. Who tried to resolve the accusation against them rather than making a nuisance out of it.
To deserve the 2nd chance.
I can give several examples but I think you are smart enough to figure out those from the way you talk. Everyone does mistakes and after having several deals with atriz on and off forum regarding loans and a few other things I don't think he had any bad intention in his mind he just didn't paid any attention.
As we know atriz admitted that they hardly collected more than 1
BTC so if Atriz can pay for the loss Caused by Bitbliss to the guy in the video and promise to be careful in future regarding managing bounties/sign campaigns for the companies like this one then he must be given a second chance.
Would like to see how many agree with me.