finfloss, your garbled post is very difficult to understand. Might I request you re-submit or edit it so it becomes clearer. Perhaps you could punctuate it and reduce the wall of text into clear and concise points you wish addressing. Also, if you are going to criticize others methods, please stop contradicting yourself by following suit.
Why invest in any security if there is a chance the CEO could run away with shareholders money? This argument of VE's is lame. It has no substance and is an attempt to undermine Ken's credibility once again which is falling on deaf ears.
where is Ken's credibility? has he shown/given you all the answers to these questions we've been asking?
Might I remind you that a person's credibility is not based solely on their propensity to reveal commercially sensitive information. Remember 'Loose lips sink ships'.
While most would agree, Ken has not been forthcoming with information and has been selective in which questions he answers, however he shows up on this forum regularly to do more than delete posts. He is also very good at replying to pm's. So why not give it a try, pm Ken with valid questions and report back to us his responses rather than attacking his character and general mud slinging.