Sorry, with all due respect, this forum's cleaning talk is a fallacy. On the internet, people are like chameleons, taking different personalities, names, addresses at any time, when desired or necessary. People are negatived/banned here, but they aren't neutralized, they will just come back with a new clean profile attacking again.

In this forum's cleaning war, the only impaired are those who want to stand loyal to their accounts, that eventually becomes worthless from many perspectives, and the only benefited ones are those who are building their reputations hunting people exclusively in inferior positions (those who doesn't have anyone behind them), putting scammers, non-scammers, abusers, non-abusers in the same basket, just because they can. It doesn't even need to make sense. It's all about personal power, influence in a forum where money plays a big role.

What people say here doesn't have much importance, unless their trust score is high. Opinions worth depending on who express it.

If you really want to clean the forum, another measures, tought and fair ones, would be necessary to be taken. Any other palliative is just a "jerry-built". Between a severe general policy and the ridiculous currently methods employed at this moment to clean the forum, the first option doesn't sound a bad idea. At least the terms would be the same for everyone, instead of the currently one where, for example, if a policeman in particular likes or dislikes according to your face or your clothes, you will be fine or in trouble. At least we would have a police instead of the currently militias.