Think of this simple analogy. Presumably Lauda and aTriz were friends before this incidence, would you expect a friend to participate in the firing squad once a sentence is laid down? I certainly wouldn't.
I know they have a responsibility here, but there are dozens of DT members, nobody reasonable should expect Lauda to neg aTriz in these circumstances.
You are wasting your time arguing with
butthurt scammers[1], account farmers and the remainder or the biased witch hunters. At the time when I still didn't neg. rate aTriz, they were complaining and calling ma a hypocrite.
When I do neg. rate aTriz, they still complain because[2].. reasons.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'd like to offer the esteemed upright Lord Lauda the post of the ArchBishop of
The Church of Ponzian Mind for being non-deceitful and negging Atriz after it was quite apparent that he was colluding in a fraud.
[1] Does that include Atriz?
[2] I dunno about others, but seriously you and The Pharmacist have done the right thing, even though I assume you are great chums with Atriz.