Is the CGM calculator wrong or crypt0.zone one as they show very different estimates for example for TUN mining profitability with 6 x GTX1080 cards:
CGM says av. 24h profitability for TUN for 6x1080 revenue $0.80 and
https://crypt0.zone/calculator says 24h profitability $5.23. There's a huge difference. From where CGM takes the block reward and net. hashrate information? From different source than crypt0.zone? Where?
If we take information from crypt0.zone then NeoScrypt 6x1080 hash should be 6.648mh/s. Network hash 354.46mh/s. Blocktime 90 seconds and block reward 5. Then we get about 90TUN per 24h according to my calculations:
https://i.imgur.com/Djr0FiM.png. Here
https://www.coinexchange.io/market/TUN/BTC I can see that last sell order is 0,00001350BTC so we get per day 0,001215BTC that is acording to Google currently $8.19.
So it seems that either CGM calculations are wrong or CGM takes block reward and net. hash or 1080 Neoscrypt hash information from different source (from where? and why you think that source is more accurate?).
Also crypt0.zone thinks most profitable is with 6*1080 cards is Lizus (LIZ). Do you think that should be added to CGM or you don't believe in every shitcoin (not sure if it is shitcoin but as I never heard of it.... and it's not in any other calculator then I suppose so)?
