I can't tell if this is a troll thread or not lol. Your poll says: "1/1"

An ICo's team matters nowadays because everyone basically sucks. I mean like, if you're looking at a coin that's an erc20 token, then you know they have 0 coding skills. I don't want to sound like a dick, but it's true. If they can't code their own blockchain coin, then that's already negative points. So you can assume they're not super great devs.

So if you see ERC20 token, immediately think that they have to either be great businessmen or revolutionary leaders. Because that's what's going to make or break that ICO. If it's some kid who just graduated college in Art History who's the CEo behind the ICO, then bail.

On the other hand, if you have a standalone coin built, and the dev is a mystery, then you can give that coin a little bit more of your time and patience. You can judge that coin by the code and function, rather than by the history of the dev team.