-snip-
Dissection of a post, seeing it for the first time![1] Anyways, I am not feeling bad for Atriz,
I am just poking a wounded guy[2]. The thing for which I am actually sad is that how some people choose to abuse the trust which the community invested in them.
Choosing a project which is later revealed to be a scam project is another thing and dragging on with a project which is clearly cheating is totally different thing. And then, I think choosing a project which follows Bitconnect's footsteps is not a great thing either. On top of that keeping ALU in dark and giving it a bad name too.[3]
The good thing is
Lauda herself tagged her and maintained her consistency[4]. Leaving a negative feedback for your business partner is the last thing you want to do as a business partner. But Lauda did it and I guess she should be applauded for that. Hopefully we will get to see the same consistency from other DT members too,
who have chosen to stay neutral[5].

[1]
Zindagi main kaafi cheezein pehli baar hoti hain. 
[2] Want some salt to go with that?

[3] This deserves a merit. I dunno if you are concern trolling, but it does deserve a merit.
Hope someone will give you that.[4] Commendable.
[5] As this post says, but we can hope.
-snip-
Almost seems like just virtue signaling if someone has to shoot out a negative feedback after a number have already been sent. Not that it's not fine but just redundant.
Moreover, they don't have to outright send a feedback but they can simply disagree with the behavior. I think the pressure to warrant a neg is fueled by indignant individuals.