I don't think that's fair. aTriz isn't asking for any redemption[1]. Sure, you can detect themes of that there but they're trying[2] (at least from what I can tell) [to the best of their ability] to rectify the situation with the Scam ICO's.
There's no more need to throw any criticism out therethe negative trust will stick for some time[3]. This isn't some half-assed attempt to try and garner favor, I'm sure.[4]
[1] I think he is apologizing and wants to make things right, so in a way, it is seeking redemption
By redemption I meant any possibility of removal or positive feedback. Like I said, 'you can detect themes of that there'.
[2] Only after being called out and who are they? I only see one single post from aTriz that actually tries to resolve it.
I'm not defending his character. I'm just saying that further criticism is pointless and thinking that the possibility of aTriz reaching a position of being able to "scam again and admit I was wrong", passing off the apology is a little childish.
[3] How are you so confident that it will stick for some time? It should be a permanent one so that people are aware of this incident; just like in case of Jamal and others who claim to have made amends, but the neg remains.
By stick for some time, I mean some long period of time, or forever.
[4] That's your opinion; for me, it is a Full-assed attempt to get back to what he was doing and had it not been for the constant questions being raised by the members and the neg, he would have conveniently ignored it; like he has in the past. Looks like he has watched the Steve Smith saga quite watchfully and is trying to emulate that here.
There's no point in trying to refund people when the negatives are going to stay with a high degree of certainty. I'm willing to say that only in an extremely rare circumstance would all the members shift it to neutral at best.
Just trying to play devil's advocate. Even though I'm not defending them. I'm just responding to the snide comment.