Lauda has 2 negative ratings, doesn't that mean he is not to be trusted? Yet his is still in DT2, it goes to show how stupid the system really is.
I can have 100 ratings, and it wouldn't change a thing. Accounts will continue to be tagged, with or without my name. The latter part of the statement does not show the stupidity of the system, but rather your own ignorance.I agree that selling highly trusted accounts would be bad but only highly trusted ones which by the way, in the recent past they were being sold too and no one was marking anyone red.
Liar or intentionally deceptive. Surprise, surprise. 
Even if Lauda is removed from DT, other people will take their place and continue marking them with red.
This. At least someone around here deserves a merit or two (or 7). ''Liar or intentionally deceptive. Surprise, surprise.
'' I'm not the one tagged red twice by trusted members, am I? You give negative ratings because you believe that person shouldn't be trusted yet you have negative ratings yourself from trusted members so why should we trust your ratings then? You see how it makes no sense?