I am not going to debate with you mate. You have your own opinion which I respect, but it so happens that it does not coincide with the team's plans, at least for now, for the reasons I explained.
You will not succeed in convincing anyone with repeated aggressive posts, even if you were right.
No team would accept to work with you and have you as a watchdog and as someone who hinders efficient decision making.
We invited you to contribute in our work channels, and if you could prove that you have skills that would benefit the leading team, then you would earn everyone's respect and a possible spot in the management team.
Whilst we did promise transparency and continuous communication, we never promised direct democracy, elections and voting. You cannot blame us for something we never promised. It is a huge misunderstanding of yours. I quote my post from a few days ago:
"Voting and decision making: There will be voting between the 7 members of the new team (so far we have a very good understanding and we have full consensus). Adding more members in the team wouldn't be effective right now, considering that we will have 1 to 2 main devs as well soon. We actively listen to all opinions posted here. We will be fully reasoning our decisions. We will keep being fully transparent and actively listening and communicating with the community. If we fail to deliver, we will resign/step down."
You chose to quit and to blackmail us, threatening that you would dump your coins and then you started spamming this thread and posting a bunch of inconsistent statements.
I think I have fully addressed this matter and from now on I choose to ignore any replies of zeki555, as I need to be more productive and to focus towards the project's success.
Some of the special functions that these nodes perform are:
- Increasing privacy of transactions
- Doing instant transactions
- Participating in governance and voting
- Enable budgeting and treasury system in cryptos
https://coinsutra.com/masternodes/Implementing masternodes will not affect the zcash compatibility, implementing masternodes would enable instant transactions as stated above, so you wouldn't have to need the zcash udate in the first place. It's not really a risk if the code is allready available, just look at snowgem, the first equihash algo with masternodes. They have a great wallet too you can adopt improve and rebrand. There's really no reason to wait or use a fork to test masternodes. You should ask the community what they think.
You mean you didn't promiss democracy. We all agreed that community voting would be implemented and that there would be voting on masternodes. Then (since you are a fierce opponent of masternodes) you decided to create a secret channel to implement this committee you created. The base for the community takeover was always transparrency and community voting. Just check the history of the main channel for yourselves.
So why wouldn't you let the community decide on wether we implement masternodes or not? Why not give the community the power to decide their coin's destiny?
You mean someone who wants to be fully transparant towards the community? You have to understand that it's not up to you to make the desicions in a community coin. And if you're not up for debate then you want to make all the decissions regarding the investment of the community. I hope you can take that load on your back, because your precedor couldn't.