how many people even know where to find the poll???....so you arent even getting the majority...just the select few who came up w/ the idea voting on it
if you are talking about the most recent poll to discuss supply reduction, it received over 1000 votes.
However, the poll was not a final decision, it was the first step to gauge interest in the issue, from the community.
the final vote will be published in due course, with a new poll, which is run for a long period of time and shared so more people can participate.
i hope this helps.
1) As a poll, the team needs set a clear time frame. I never see any public poll has no due date means the team can determine when to terminate the poll at their best interests.
2) The team should respect the results of the public poll, even if the results could not be what the team expects.
3) We understand the poll may not be a final decision however if the team is trying to over ignore the voice of the community. The team will loose the trust of the community at all.
I agree. I can understand why the team does not expect to reduce the supply from 4 billions to 0.5 billions with 6 months halving cycle. It's too soon. However, 1 billion @ 1 year would be a good idea. There will definitely be a compromised reduction decision made between the team and everyone in the community. Again, team needs to consider the voice of the community. Without strong community, this coin is nothing especially for a non-ico, non-premining project.