Was Bitblisscoin.com under ALU as opposed to purely aTriz?
I am not quite clear on this one. And I would like to know which campaigns of aTriz's (which were scummy/scams) were in fact under ALU rule.
If the parties were not involved in the campaigns then they shouldn't be held responsible.
Isn't it funny how projects that were managed by aTriz are now being divided into ALU and ATriz projects. What is the use of a co-operative if not to benefit all of its member, or at the very least some?
a) Not yet proven to be scam project = ALU
b) Proven Scams = aTriz
Is it safe to say that aTriz will not respond to allegations of being a sold account?
Don't count on it, but expect a heartfelt apology.
As to whether aTriz is Lauda, I very much doubt it, but it wouldn't surprise me. There are a couple of other accounts that I suspect are most likely hers but I cannot say for sure.