I had expressed hesitation about tagging merit abusers early on, because there's so much subjectivity about the system, but at the same time there are some users who are obviously sending merit to people who don't deserve it. Obvious to my eyes, anyway. And that's the problem. I realize my feedback now carries more weight than someone who's not on DT, and I know I ought to hand out negatives to people who really deserve them. Do you guys think I, or any other DT member, should be tagging merit abusers? EthanB suggested in another thread that a neutral might be appropriate, and I don't think that's a horrible idea when there's doubt. But I don't think neutrals do much good.
The Pharmacist, Hi

I believe that it makes sense to mark such accounts with red trust, in particular accounts that are clearly abused by merit.
In the telegram there are already groups of people who are engaged in sales. In these groups they also sell bills, with artificial merit

As for the neutral mark, as far as I know, neutral comments slowly increase trust, (correct me if I'm wrong).