=> 1 merit source has to look to an average of 106 new posts/day or 3,255 new posts/month in order to make the system works as intended.
This assumption is wrong. At least half the posts isn't worth reading at all (check
recent unread posts and see how often the word "bounty" is in the title).
That leaves less than 53 posts per day to read by your math. That's not much at all for an active member.
Update: I forgot the overlap in sources reading the same posts as other sources. Let me rephrase it: I think 90% of all new posts isn't worth reading, and I'll
prove it provide empirical evidence by showing the 10 newest (English) posts from the unread posts link:
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10I totally agree with LoyceV here, your arguments started with a bunch of numbers that are clearly not real.
You went and grabbed that average 8538.39 but you neglected this:
Top 10 Boards:
Announcements (Altcoins) 5949003
Bounties (Altcoins) 2358465
Altcoin Discussion 1825601
That's around 1/3 of the entire board and I'm guessing it's growing at a faster pace than the rest of the it and then there are the local boards and the off-topic which are Post&Go spam stations.
Also, it takes 1 to 2 seconds to read a on line or two line posts and decide that it deserves no merit.
Please could you qualify that. Do you mean merit sources with unallocated source merits, or do you mean their earned sMerits that they haven't spent.
I do never talk about someone wealth. Sources are free to keep it or spend it the way they like.
I do care only about source smerits received every 30 days and how to distribute it properly.
What are we going to do when the D-1 goes offline? We're going to have D-2? Then D-3?
Why over complicating a system that is not even 6 months old?