When choosing an ICO campaign to participate in the signature campaign, I first of all assess the prospects and need for the project itself in terms of its usefulness for people, what convenience and improvement of our life will be achieved by the implementation of this project and in this regard - how much will be released in the course of it tokens. I also pay attention to the number of participants in the signature campaign. On the one hand, a large number of people who joined this project indicate that many have already assessed this project as promising, especially if the signatures were joined in large part by high ranks. However, on the other hand, a smaller number of participants suggests a larger amount of generosity. However, not always. Recently, in the context of joining the signature campaign in the general provisions, it is stated that the ICO project team has the right to change the amount of payments if the joined participants prove to be too small. I have already seen similar cases. Therefore, as a result, the number of participants in the generosity campaign does not significantly affect the amount of payments.