Selection of projects will be based on both historical research and scientific underwater surveys that have already physically located wrecks from which our experts believe valuable recoveries can be made.
Ok, but you still haven't addressed my above points that are massive red flags. You have heavily protected wrecks on your site, plus wrecks that have already been recovered. Give me an example of a wreck you are going to explore that has yet to be excavated. Likewise what are you going to do with all of the other material that you don't count as 'valuable'? Are you just going to leave all that material down there? Are you going to actually record the artifacts you recover and their context in actual excavation? Or are you just going down to plunder stuff from the ocean, because if that's the case, this project is amoral.
I know many maritime archaeologists and they all have all recoiled when shown this project, which seems to just be a way to fund your own personal private collection that you can auction to the highest bidder. This is a perfect example of what has become wrong with crypto over the past year and why all the current 'investors' are no different to the banks that just ripped profit from anywhere they could, at any cost 10 years ago.