Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 10000 miners
by
Dihlofos
on 19/04/2018, 15:16:31 UTC
Patrike,

The GPU settings dialog doesn't list the card name, only the GPU number and a colon.  The values come over from the remote servers, but no card type/name, etc

Am I missing something to enable this?



Patrick, when will you fix this mistake?
How much can we talk about this error?
The GPU tab displays the names of cards from other settings when these cards are not physically located on the selected installation. And on the monitoring tab, their order also does not match.

This error should be corrected and not say that it is very difficult.

if you would use the web based help, It would have answered most all of your questions.

You can already fix the order and have been able to do this for a long time.  Use the "map to system monitoring" button and drag and drop them in the order you want them.  Beyond that I doubt there is much that can be done because the OS determined the order they are initialized  via the driver and there is no way that software can tell the OS how to reorder them.

http://www.awesomeminer.com/help/gpumapping.aspx

Also there are some features that require you to buy a legitimate license, if you haven't done that, then I suspect demanding change isn't going to get you very far.


Try to drag and distribute everything in order, but it does not work and does not solve the problem. It turns out everything in a shuffle.
Video cards fall into the group from another rig.
Other developers of such programs have implemented this very simply, I do not know why there is a problem here?
They will grow up a list of maps and then sort them according to the model.

If your rig showing GPUs from another rig, you have serious misconfig issue with your hosts.
I have no problems is problems in AM.
I tried everything, in different Riga, locally and nothing changes. On one Riga with a GTX 1080 and 1070, have created two groups and 1080 GTX 1070. But the cards in the monitoring fall from one group to another and they can not be distributed. This is a software defect.


Ok, this is confusing...

I'm assuming you are using free version of AM based on  your posts (i wouldn't buy AM if I can't even get custom mining software working). So guessing what you did was trying to have 2 miners, one for 1080(s), one for 1070(s).

You don't really have to ummm, create groups for them, but even if you do, it's for visual management pleasure. You do want 2 miners setup for each card though, obviously each have strength in differing algos. What you really need to do is to set proper parameter via Command Line Options, to make sure the mining softwares uses the correct card per their own profile/template. Drag and drop don't work here, mining requires good computer literacy, it's not plug and play money printing business.

I have a rig with 1060 and 970, no probolemo at all with this kind of scenario, overclocking no prob and they happily mine their own most profitable algo via 2 managed profit miners, running different clocking profiles..

Why don't you post some screenshots to illustrate what you trying to achieve...it's going to be better than 1000 words and we can make sure there are no misunderstanding here...don't judge about sw defects without seeking help.


https://d.radikal.ru/d16/1804/2e/5b9d0997fada.png

https://c.radikal.ru/c12/1804/5d/0e68f3a8dff2.png

https://a.radikal.ru/a10/1804/b0/f622c26ac518.png

https://d.radikal.ru/d41/1804/da/b9d8e983281b.png

I tried everything, in different Riga, locally and nothing changes. On one Riga with a GTX 1080 and 1070, have created two groups and 1080 GTX 1070.  The pictures all show that when monitoring is enabled, the graphics cards on the GPU tab are shuffled.

It is necessary that their order was defined as well as in miner, then there will be no problems. To this came already all programmers.  Miner reads the order cart in the same sequence as they are listed in the operating system. To this came all the developers of software for mining. But apparently AM an exception.