You can phrase it however you want but you are touting this alternative currency on a Bitcoin discussion forum; Bitcoin of course being built upon with fair and open source concepts. People who join this community tend to hold similar viewpoints. Which is why historically alternative currencies which are closed source or do not have a fair start (owner keeping a hoard of the coins for themself) are shot down and 'trolled' hard.
Please don't get on your high horse to me about pump and dumps and other annoying and misused terms. You yourself are a founding member of Emunie hoping to receive Emu from Fuseleer by kissing his ass so it therefore makes yourself look rather idiotic that you try to berate me for criticising the investment potential.
Anyone and everyone is invited to join in from the start. Unlike any other "alt-coin", emunie will need funds to stabilize supply from wild swings and vultures only interested in making pump and dumps. Can you tell which one of your "fair" and "open-source" crypto coins would actually be able to achieve such a thing? Wait, you can't; because none exists. While Satoshi's intention might have not been to foster millions of dollars through pump and dumps and pyramiding, that is exactly what has happened (and is still happening). Where is the fairness in that? Emunie is trying to solve most of the problems associated with commodity type currencies or electronic currencies, as well as introducing a feature rich ecosystem. This is just the crypto side of emunie as well, this doesn't even consider the staggering potential of the network itself, something that can be easily adopted by open source projects in the future.
About kissing ass and all that baloney. So people get "rewarded" a SMALL amount of emu for investing their time in testing and development, isn't that but fair?