What is your opinion on clairvoyant prediction about futures prices versus analytical/fundamental prediction ?
Do you go for : whatever it is as long as the results are good ? OR, whatever is the result, bad or good, you would stay with the same approach ?Here is the example of a
clairvoyant approach from a 13 year clairvoyant person who have been through the mathematical/artificial intelligence for 25 years.... https://www.theclairvoyantinvestor.comOh this is quite new and interesting! Well I would go for the the analytical approach because I believe that whatever result will come out from it, that means that it has enough evidence, well tested and have pattern before it had been created.
For the clairvoyant, I would have to say that I do not really believe in that .
But how a technical analysis is tested ? It is through a high number of events, to see the level of accuracy over time... So, isn't the same thing for clairvoyance IF tested over a high enough number of events in comparaison to standard deviation from randomness ?
Would you believe it if you were able to test it with enough events or even if it pass the test you have some kind of reluctance to use something that works but you do not understand ? This is the same thing for Artificial Intelligence, we use it and get a result that works but we are unable to explain the formula we find , even to understand it.
Thanks for your honest opinion, I appreciate.