he is accusing me that i am going to sell my alt accounts,without any proofs such speculation is stupidity.
I suspect you are going to do just that, yes, but that isn't why I left you all that feedback. I left it
because of this.
It did immediately strike me that you might have been registering usernames with ones that might be popular later on, and those like "crypto____" would likely be more desired than some others. It appeared to me that you were forming a portfolio of sorts, of bitcointalk accounts.
You can continue to try to get me off of DT, and I wish you well. Wouldn't be the first time, as you know. I would accept that graciously--probably more so than I did the first time. But while I'm on it I plan on trying to help clean up the forum the best I can. I'm not going to continue to tag individual shitposters, but people who have confirmed (or strongly suspected) alt accounts who are spamming nonsense in order to profit at bitcointalk's expense? Yeah, I don't feel badly about tagging them. They shouldn't be trusted. Especially not when they do what you did, which was to use multiple accounts to say essentially the same thing in the same thread. That's toxic.
On a related note, look at
this thread. This right here shows how bad this problem is. I realize "bounty" could mean social media ones, but my guess is that signature campaigns are lumped into the answers, which are disheartening. These people will spam anything in order to get paid. Let 'em do it on Facebook and Twitter and leave bitcointalk alone.
Should The Pharmacist leave negatives for people who spam?
I'm not making it a habit. His posts and some others I found yesterday were particularly egregious.
Spams should be a 7day ban or anythigng else,but to tag my accounts with reds without trying to scam people? that is purely BS.
Spammers and scammers always feel they're entitled to dictate the consequences after they're caught.