is there any reason you using 3 worker names? if there on the same connection id suggest just using 1 using 3 might be using unnecessary bandwidth
We choose this configuration because it was the most efficient a few hours after start. Now we've directed the 3 ports to the same worker using 1 unique name as you suggested, the two rates seem stick closer indeed, sometimes it's reversed so as pool estimated rate is higher than noncerate... interesting ! Thanks for the advice